Monthly Archives: November 2015

11/9

This week we discussed patents, trademarks, and copyright. A patent is something that applies to an invention, while a trademark applies to a commercial entity such as a logo, name, or phrase. A copyright, however, is given to the person who creates an original work for a certain amount of time. Copyrights are registered with the US copyright office of the Library of Congress. If a work is not copyrighted, then it is in the public domain and belongs to everyone and no one. The first US Copyright Act of 1790 granted rights for 14 years, if the author was still alive at the end of that term then it was renewable for 14 more years. Every time the copyright terms were reevaluated after that, more time was added to the term. Our copyright issue is inflected by the fact that we live in a corporatized economy. Meaning, everyone is only interested in making money. This does a great deal to stifle creativity in the world, because every little thing is copyrighted. We struggle to discover a way to reward the creator and founder of an idea, without stopping anyone else from using it. In fact, one Washington lawyer tried to challenge a law that extended copyrights even further, claiming the extension restricts an artist’s First Amendment right to drawn on works from other artists. This extension was enacted with heavy support and endorsement from Time Warner and Walt Disney, thus proving the fact that we live in a corporatized economy. This disallows people to build upon and further develop ideas that others have already created. There is a positive side to copyright, in that it allows people to protect their original ideas. For instance, Taylor Swift was being sued for steeling the words to “Shake it Off.” Someone claimed they had written the chorus to that song several years prior. Regardless of whether or not he did write it, Taylor Swift filed copyright for the song and therefore he lost the case.
http://www.latimes.com/entertainment/music/posts/la-et-ms-judge-uses-taylor-swift-lyrics-in-cheeky-dismissal-of-shake-it-off-lawsuit-20151112-story.html
This reinforces the importance of protecting your ideas, before someone is able to take credit for your work.

10/26

This week we discussed wikipedia and how a page develops throughout time. Wikipedia allows someone to register by making an account, and then edit any page they like. This obviously has its pros and cons, one of which being anyone can say anything they want about… anything. Often times people will post negative or inappropriate comments on wikipedia pages, or even inaccurate information. This began to monitor itself because other users would “clean up” the page. However, now there is an option to lock the page and close it for edits. I think this says a lot about the development of technology throughout time because people are now able to make their own imprint on possibly historical sources. This can, however, be detrimental to certain historical sources that receive incorrect information. I think using wikipedia as a source is a fantastic idea, but comes with several implications, like any source you would use. It is important to verify the author/creator of the source, compare it to other sources discussing the same subject matter, and back it up with other claims of evidence. So many people discredit wikipedia due to the fact that someone can add their own information to the page, however that is what makes it so unique. We now have the ability to gain information from thousands of different types of people, who view things differently, just by reading one source. This is all thanks to the development of technology and media throughout time, for that access is a luxury that no one had before the internet grew into what it is now. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Article_development

Week of 10/21

This week we discussed the development of the internet in that access to historical sources are now more easily accessible. There are several reasons this could be hurtful or beneficial. For instance, many historical documents are not completely true, and require tons of background information and verification. We discussed an example of this when Howell Cobb claimed that none of the african americans in the confederacy were armed, and Steiner claimed that he led a group of armed african americans. This disagreement between to historical sources is just the beginning when it comes to differing accounts of historical occurrences. That being said, before the development of the internet you had to have expert credentials to gain access to these documents. However, now anyone, possibly someone without the proper knowledge to fully understand a source, has access to these types of documents. Despite the possibility of misinterpretation, it is beneficial to the development of society in that everyone has the ability to learn more about the past and their personal history. This is due to the development of technology and the internet, and has done a great deal to shape the world we live in today.

Week of 10/14

This week we reviewed “Where Dead Voices Gather.” To preface the discussion of the minstrel show, we stated that the act of thinking is the act of placing things in categories. This comes into play because we place both people and music into categories. Specifically, racial categories. There is an expectation and stereotype based upon what white and african american people listen to. The Minstrel Show began to blur those lines throughout the 20s and 30s. Nick Tosches analyzes the Minstrel Man throughout his book, “Where Dead Voices Gather.” Men would dress up in blackface and use a “trick voice” to perform in shows and sing songs, all the while portraying themselves as African American men. Minstrel shows displayed African Americans as dim-witted, lazy, happy-go-lucky people throughout the post civil war era. It was heavily criticized by racial injustice groups for portraying slaves as “happy” people. I believe the minstrel show began to blur the lines between “racially appropriate” music. White rappers or blues musicians thrive on performing and working with music that used to be solely for African Americans. Plenty of white people who do not like African americans themselves, love these types of music. They haven’t even realized that these white musicians are imitating African Americans. The minstrel show began as a parody to pass judgment and make light of the situation that African Americans were in throughout the 20s and 30s, but served a much more important purpose.

Hist 390 Nov. 2 – Digital Scavenger Hunt

I chose to do a digital scavenger hunt regarding the history of country music. I chose this phrase/genre because I grew up listening to country music, going to Nashville to see all of the historical places, as well as attending countless concerts. I thought I knew about country music, but it turns out I only knew a lot about modern country music.

I ran a quick search on ngram and found that the phrase “country music” was used minimally throughout the 1800 and 1900s, but really took off in 1962. It is possible that the continuation of the Cold War or the beginning of the US involvement in the Vietnam War played a part in this,   specifically the latter of the two. I believe the foundation and root of country music is American pride, something that would have been very important at the time of war. Another possibility would be the development and popularity of the radio, something that country music relied on. “Country music, like all great American art forms, has its roots in commerce: that is to say, it took commercial recording companies and radio stations to nurture the country style,” says Richard Carlin author of Country Music: A Biographical Dictionary. I believe this does a nice job of summing up the history of country music; development. As our nation grew, so did the genre. Now that our country has reached the height of social media, technology, and urban development, I believe country music will have to work hard to keep up.

The use of the phrase “country music” peaked in the 1990s and had a stead rise throughout the 2000s. However, since 2002, there has been a slight decline that has continued even into 2015. I believe this is due to the fact that more and more people are becoming less interested in the genre as a whole, due to the many new genres popping up all over the world. Also, globalization has played a huge role in the types of music we listen to in America. Today’s generation has the ability to listen to music from all over the world at the push of a button, something that was not possible in the 1960s.

I took my search to google books and found around a million results regarding the first use of the term “country music.” However, most of these results were either Country Music Greats or the Encyclopedia of Country Music. I was not able to find the exact year the term began being used, but with all of the books written about it I would have to assume that it has a fairly rich history. I also searched country music roots on pro-quest and discovered there was a Back-to-roots movement in the 1920s in which country musicians felt as though the genre was falling away from its home-grown roots. I think this could have something to do with the roaring twenties and the fast paced life many people began living. Additionally, the fact that country music did not really become very popular until the 1960s could also have something to do with that.